Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hieronymus

What is theoretically possible? Killing this bill and letting everyones taxes go up?


18 posted on 01/01/2013 1:23:57 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: indianrightwinger

Getting something that doesn’t involve $330 Billion in new spending? Actually cutting spending?


24 posted on 01/01/2013 1:30:31 PM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
What is theoretically possible? Killing this bill and letting everyones taxes go up?

Yes . elections have consequences

37 posted on 01/01/2013 1:51:06 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
What is theoretically possible? Killing this bill and letting everyones taxes go up?

If they pass this bill, it will add $330 billion to the deficit in FY 2013 and add $4 trillion to the national debt over a ten year period.

I say if it means taxes go up on everyone, so be it. The voters want all the benefits of the welfare state and don't want to pay for it. Maybe we will get the public's attention focussed on our dire fiscal condition by letting them see how much it costs. We need to stop insulating the public from the pain of our huge deficits and debt and preventing the bill from being passed on to our children and grandchildren.

62 posted on 01/01/2013 3:02:58 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson