Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueunicorn6; alloysteel; GreaterSwiss; Nervous Tick; library user; verga; Gaffer; ...
From another Foxnews piece...

Logistically speaking, it is highly unlikely that both chambers can pass anything by midnight, after which the more than $500 billion in tax hikes are set to start kicking in, followed by sweeping spending cuts.

To me it looks like the better deal for we-the-people is for them to NOT reach a deal. At least then 'sweeping spending cuts' will take place, and 500 billion in new taxes is supposedly slightly LESS than what the 'Deal' stipulates. Can we verify that?

I think what this POS prez really wants is no deal - so he can continue to blame republicans for the 'fix' we are in. When HE is the MAIN REASON we find ourselves in this financial chaos.

Look (perhaps) for a NewYears day hail-mary to pass, with little difference in what has been proposed, with LOWER spending cuts.

58 posted on 12/31/2012 1:50:44 PM PST by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Ron C.

Agreed....he wants no deal.


62 posted on 12/31/2012 1:56:25 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson