Posted on 12/30/2012 5:39:04 AM PST by billorites
exactly, one bad idea leads to the next one
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
when she grows up it’ll be too late
Ask Chastity Bono when the optimal age to be introduced into lesbianism is? For her nanny it was 11.... same age that NYC mandates the pro-sex sex-ed course..... coincidence?
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
He should have seen a lawyer...or have the lesbians pay for his legal consultation. The lawyer would have told him no!!!
Agree.....as was his wife, and the two lesbians.
"Neither a borrower nor a lender be; For loan oft loses both itself and friend, and borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry."
Then I would have to disagree. A straight, infertile couple of good character is better than dykes or homos raising kids.
He should have put a label on the Container, intended only for use as a Topical Ointment or Energy Drink.
True. In which case they can formally adopt the child and the problem will be solved. But this idea that you're going to go spreading your seed around and because things weren't done in the natural way you get off responsibility scot-free doesn't jibe with my notions of social rectitude.
Since this obviously hinges on the question of reproductive rights the answer is obvious. Employers must provide child support insurance for all women they employ without any copay being required.
The State of Kansas does not care about the private agreement between parties it cares that they forked over money and now have found a way to recover that money.
I disagree. The plethora of laws that now bind us have made us all criminals. Who can possibly know them?
He’s fool enough to take the word of these women he met on Craig’s List
This country was built on that sort of trust [don't lecture me about lesbians, I'm talking about trust between individuals] and overweaning government is destroying that.
The law should be explicit: If you are the father of a child, you have no rights to the child, unless the mother and/or state give them to you. You have all responsibilities unless the mother and/or state don’t require them. That way, everyone knows up front.
The sexual orientation of the women is irrelevant to me, so don’t presume to tell me not to “lecture” you. This was simply “real world” stupid. One must deal with the world as it is, not as one thinks it should be.
Yes. But not being a lawyer should not be a penalty. Are you a lawyer? Why are you fighting me on this point:?
No, I’m not a lawyer, but I know what kinds of things I wouldn’t do without a lawyer - and spreading my DNA around outside of my own family is way up there on that list.
I agree with you on that point. I just think the man is being treated unjustly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.