Posted on 12/30/2012 4:25:17 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
December 30th, 2012
Guests to be interviewed on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): President Barack Obama.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. Chuck U. Schumer, D-N.Y.; Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.; Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.; Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo.; Rep. Darrel Issa, R-Calif.; Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich.; Rep. Donna Edwards, D-Md.; Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.
Yeah, gluten (glue)...found in abundance in refined wheat flour.
It's "a protein composite found in foods processed from wheat, barley and rye. Gluten gives elasticity to dough, helping it rise and keep its shape and often gives the final product a chewy texture."
Most processed foods contain a lot of it. That and tons of sugar are probably a large reason why Americans are so...well, large.
Do the employers get a 2% reduction in their match?
If not, hell’s bell’s, where does their extra 2% go?
Does the employee still get credit for full salary or do they goose up the value of the dudctions to determine the salry on which to base the Social Security comes time to collect.
Inquiring minds want to know.
LOL, I don’t think I’d be going out to eat if I had to do all that.
So what’s your secret exercise routine?
Still, I even visit the loony liberal Internet forums cuz we lose through ignorance of the Evil Lefts' grass roots think tanks.
Think any good general or diplomat during WWII DID NOT read Mein Kampf?
I appreciate your response but I am still curious.
Should I serve her something with NO flour of any sort in it? I mean, come on, I am serving a shrimp platter. Surely shrimp has no gluten? I am not frying, just steamed shrimp, peeled and de-veined.
Hummous? No gluten, right?
Clementines, in top season right now as I type, surely they have no gluten?
The little crab cakes are breaded so I understand there’s probably gluten.
Also, gluten isn’t fattening, is it?
I appreciate your response but I am still curious.
Should I serve her something with NO flour of any sort in it? I mean, come on, I am serving a shrimp platter. Surely shrimp has no gluten? I am not frying, just steamed shrimp, peeled and de-veined.
Hummous? No gluten, right?
Clementines, in top season right now as I type, surely they have no gluten?
The little crab cakes are breaded so I understand there’s probably gluten.
Also, gluten isn’t fattening, is it?
I have no doubt that the public will be hollering, but the payroll tax holiday for the past two years has increased our debt and deficit by close to two hundred billion dollars. It is just another stimulus package.
Source: CBO Combined OASDI Trust Funds; January 2011 Baseline 26 Jan 2011. Note: See Primary Surplus line (which is negative, indicating a deficit)
Matters are even worse than this chart shows. In December, Congress passed a Social Security tax reduction. Workers are temporarily paying 2 percentage points less, from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent, in Social Security payroll taxes this calendar year. Since the government is making up the shortfall out of general revenues, CBOs deficit projections for the trust funds do not include that. But CBOs figures predict that the payroll tax holiday will cost the governments general fund $85 billion in this fiscal year and $29 billion in fiscal year 2012 (which starts Oct.1, 2011.) Since every dollar of that will have to be borrowed, the combined effect of the tax holiday and the annual deficits will amount to a $130 billion addition to the federal deficit in the current fiscal year, and $59 billion in fiscal 2012.
Social Security has passed a tipping point. For years it generated more revenue than it consumed, holding down the overall federal deficit and allowing Congress to spend more freely for other things. But those days are gone. Rather than lessening the federal deficit, Social Security has at last as long predicted become a drag on the governments overall finances.
As recently as October, CBO was projecting that it would be 2016 before outlays regularly exceed revenues. But Social Securitys fiscal troubles are more severe than was thought, and the latest projections show the permanent deficits started several years ahead of earlier predictions.
Dont be confused by the fact that the trust funds are projected to continue growing for several more years. Thats because Treasury must still credit interest payments to the funds on the borrowings from earlier years. But unless taxes are increased or other spending is cut severely, the government will have to borrow from the public to pay the interest that it owes to the trust funds.
And dont be misled by those who say the system can pay full benefits until about 2037 without making any changes to the law. Thats true, but does not change the fact that Social Security taxes no longer cover those benefits. The government is now borrowing money to pay them, and will do so every year for the foreseeable future. And keep in mind, if nothing is done, when those trust funds are exhausted, benefits would have to be cut by 22 percent in 2037, and more each year after that, according to the most recent report of the systems trustees. By 2084, the system will generate only enough revenue to pay for 75 percent of promised benefit levels.
Anyone who thinks that the payroll tax holiday should continue is a low information voter. It is pure and simple a scam. It is just another unfunded stimulus package that increases our debt and deficit.
sushi
I think she did say "armed guard". I also believe the guard at Columbine was on break and too far away to hit anything with a pistol.
First off, heh, I actually got a 1099 from Chicken Soup for the Soul publishers.....can't deny Obama's voters their cell phones now can we?
A long while back I actually told the story, on THIS very thread, of how my dog was attacked as I walked lawfully upon my public street, as she was harnessed and tethered with sturdy leash. I was taking her for a walk as was my wont but TWO dogs, different occassions, came out of nowhere and attacked her.
She didn't kill the dogs but one was a little dog, the other a cocker spaniel. They came out from their yards and attacked her on the street. They survived her defense but come on, she's a Belgian Malinois...a very protective dog. And in her dog mind she was protecting ME.
Vet says some dogs, other dogs see them as a threat and attack them. Neither case was my dog doing a thing wrong.
But the hell with it. I decided no more do I walk dog.
Still and so she needs exercise and so do I.
So I began walking around my yard. Indeed, in circles, a circle 75 feet in diameter. Yeah, got a "dirt ring" in my yard but I take picture of it to show doctors my exercise ring.
There are a gazillion things to do while walking...talk on cell phone, record my two do list, listen to my MP3 player, radio talk shows....yada, yada. Besides, how is walking around in circles in my yard much different than walking on one of those walking exercise machines?
Also have cooling fan set up on deck, lawn chair, take coffee out and yeah, dogs walks in circles with me.
Normal exercise session is 30 walks around dirt circle. This equals, converting feet to yards, about 7 1/2 football fields that I walk-four times a week.
Dog gets to play frisbee at intervals, chasing ball. I also do all back yard work, picking up fallen "tree" lumber, tossing compost pile, brushing dog, filling bird feeders.
That's another thing, I adore birds and love being out with them. They're all so used to me they just fly down and get seeds right by my head...."don't mind me, you keep on walking."
Story was printed in a Chicken Soup for the Soul book titled "A NEW YOU".
My doctor was so impressed she put my book in her waiting room. also go to local book signings, that sort of thing.
AND I MUST REPORT MY INCOME.....HEH.
I"ll second that.
Exaclty FIsh it never ends!
(I’m tired of saving the world my kids left some mimosa mix....)
Can you say Cloward/Piven...
...without it, munchies may taste good but the message from the stomach is that you actually ate nothing (most snacks are puffed and poofed yet are really small portions) much like cotton candy.
If anything gluten has helped to prevent obesity by making pigs pay top dollar for puffy poofy food lower in calories than what the porky appetites thought ingested.
It’s the availiability of free welfare food, the smug entitlement gloating of others being forced to pay for the maintenance of your fat lazy ass, and depression triggered glutony that makes the pig.
Yes. We have nuclear weapons, and a distinct advantage in drone / remote warfare technology.
You need some other options besides nuclear war and drones. And you need the personnel and delivery systems to make them work.
And we are not in a declared war.
WWII was our last declared war. We face asymetrical threats. OBL declared war on the US in 1996.
Along with the 1.4 million active duty you cite, we also have the 20,000 contractor Secretary Of State army in Iraq, the TSA, and other people we don't want to call military on various payrolls all over the place.
So how would you defend our diplomatic and NGO presence in Iraq? If you think that TSA is a quasi military force then how about police and other state and local law enforcement personnel? Or the FBI? Or the CIA? Or NSA?
So if we did have a shooting war, and we can send in drones or warplanes stationed in Missouri, why do we need a military geared to sending 300-400,000 troops somewhere for years at a time with no end result in mind?
We don't have 300,000 to 400,000 troops to send anywhere now. Our military has already been significantly cut over the past decade. We need to look at what the threats are and how to best combat them now and in the future.
We also need to ask such questions as to what our role in the world is in terms of strategic security interests. Do we need to keep the sea lanes open around the world? We have a navy now of 323,000 with less than 300 ships, down significantly from the days when I served in the 60s and 70s when we had a 600 ship navy.
You can rationalize all the cuts you want but there are irreducible limits that should not be passed. You cannot reconstitute a trained military force overnight. It could take a generation to replace a trained cadre of people given the sophistication of our weapons systems and the training needed. And it depends on a steady influx of people to move up thru the ranks gaining experience and training.
Reducing our armed forces to 500,000 is sheer insanity. It sends a powerful message to our enemies and invites adventurism that makes the world less secure.
gluten isnt fattening, is it?
Probably not, but the flour also contains tons of starch, which is. After all, farmers fatten up livestock on a grain diet....not cheeseburgers.
Very well said.
Walking is very good for you......a lot harder to do in the winter (at least for me). That’s always a problem once the real winter hits, like now. Maybe I’ll try walking around the garage. :-)
Congratulations on your story being published!
No.
If not, hells bells, where does their extra 2% go?
The employer pays the same amount as does the self-employed. The SSTF receives the amount of the reduction from Treasury in the form of non-market, interest bearing T-bills, which holds SS harmless for the reduction in revenue. However, the shortfall must be made up by cashing in the T-bills by redeeming them from the General Fund, which borrows 42 cents of every federal dollar spent. Thus, the payroll tax holiday is just another unfunded stimulus.
Does the employee still get credit for full salary or do they goose up the value of the dudctions to determine the salry on which to base the Social Security comes time to collect.
The individual contribution is credited as though the full payment was made.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.