Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

Nope, called them up and had them add it. I’m sure the ramdom texts every 2-3 weeks covers your one party consent. You don’t like the parents having the family plan like most everyone who has plans then buy her a phone yourself.


65 posted on 12/28/2012 7:18:31 PM PST by bgill (We've passed the point of no return. Welcome to Al Amerika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: bgill

“Nope, called them up and had them add it.”

In other words, you consented for that service to be added to your plan. Legally, that’s the same thing as signing an amendment to your contract, since the phone companies have to get recorded verbal consent to add services. If they don’t, you don’t legally have to pay for them.

“I’m sure the ramdom texts every 2-3 weeks covers your one party consent.”

One party consent is derived from the instance of communication that is being recorded. If you had a phone call or text communication with someone 2 or 3 weeks ago, in a one party consent state, you could have recorded that conversation, but it doesn’t give you any permission to continue to record conversations that person has that do not involve you.

“You don’t like the parents having the family plan like most everyone who has plans then buy her a phone yourself.”

I don’t care about family plans, you are the one who brought them up. I was commenting about the parents wiretapping their daughter’s phone and electronic communications illegally. I don’t think the two things are really very related at all, unless you think most parents are somehow using the family plan to commit wiretapping?


66 posted on 12/28/2012 8:54:27 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson