To: Ron H.
The question is, did he have a legal permit?
34 posted on
12/27/2012 5:52:05 PM PST by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer. FREEDOM OR FREE STUFF- YOU GET ONE CHOICE, CHOOSE WISELY)
To: TribalPrincess2U
The question is, did he have a legal permit? At least in your mind it would appear. I wasn't addressing the gun issue but rather the speech issue. Duhh?!!
37 posted on
12/27/2012 6:27:15 PM PST by
Ron H.
(Democrats and Republicans - not a dimes worth of difference anymore!)
To: TribalPrincess2U
“The question is, did he have a legal permit?
“
The question SHOULD be :”Why isn’t the Second Amendment recognized as the ONLY permit needed?”
All licensing of arms is an infringement.
39 posted on
12/27/2012 6:47:32 PM PST by
hoosierham
(Freedom isn't free)
To: TribalPrincess2U
The question is, did he have a legal permit?A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
49 posted on
12/27/2012 9:58:15 PM PST by
Dr.Deth
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson