Posted on 12/27/2012 10:23:15 AM PST by katiedidit1
"When asked by a federal judge whether he thought all Muslims are terrorists, he answered: "I'd say most of them are."
A deal between prosecutors and Linn, 52, calls for him to be sentenced to 20 years next April. He pleaded guilty to intentionally damaging and destroying religious property and two gun-related charges.
(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...
The judge actually said that with a straight face? How many dead (civilian and military) in Muslim countries? Hey buddy, remember 9/11/01? Symbol of peace my lily white backside.
"You are no better than the terrorists or extremists you sought to punish," Zouhary said.
That judge isn't too bright. Condemns the Marine, admonishing him about "peace" then turns around and confirms the very thing he just denied. Acknowledges that the act was intended to punish terrorists and extremists - at a Mosque.
^Jazusamo:) it infuriates me that Linn may serve 20 yrs in prison for a crime in which noone was injured. Hate crime laws need to be challenged.
Yes. Click the link in post 11. I posted an excerpt less than 300 words and less than 50% of the actual article.
20 years for burning a mosque? What’s the going rate for burning a church?
thread police? Why not click on the article instead of threadcrapping... maybe watch out the window for some kid to step on your lawn.
20 years is too much. This wasn’t a hate crime as much as it was mis-directed grieving. This Marine needs peer-to-peer counseling, probation, and to pay for damages.
A peaceful, forgiving people, church, and religion would also ask for the recommendations I’ve outlined above.
I wonder what these Muslims asked for?
(I had a bad friend once get an arson charge and he didn’t do any jail time.)
When Christian Churches are burned down, what kind of sentences are handed down? How does this burning of a prayer rug compare?
My suspicion is this sentence was harsh to appease Muslims.
How can 20 years be outrageous when Linn plead Guilty and accepted the 20 year sentence?
“U.S. District Judge Jack Zouhary told Linn that his acts were an attack on all places of religion and that the mosque was a symbol of peace.”
Objection!
Assumes facts, not in evidence!
Conjecture, your Honor!
It is YOU that should brush up on FR rules. Your whining is distracting from the article and NOONE else is having a problem.
I agree, especially that he went through the building to make sure no one was there. Hate crime laws should be done away with...period.
“U.S. District Judge Jack Zouhary”
It figures, the judge is Lebanese! Linn was right about the Muslims being mostly terrorists. It’s like most of the Blacks hate White people. You may not like the answer, but sadly, it’s the truth.
“Why not click on the article ...”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did you not see post 8. I posted it.
(You’re welcome)
The 300 word excerpt does not apply to AP articles, they are supposed to be excerpted “very briefly.”
Yes. Click the link in post 11. I posted an excerpt less than 300 words and less than 50% of the actual article.
<><><><
Are you hoping for a FR Commendation or something? I fail to understand why you’ve made this thread about your alleged excerpting skills.
Go ahead and take a gold star out of petty cash for your efforts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.