Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Snyder reveals his conversation with President Barack Obama
Mlive.com ^ | December 26, 2012 | Tim Skubick

Posted on 12/26/2012 9:36:25 AM PST by cripplecreek

Lots of folks scoffed in town when reports surfaced that Democrats had petitioned the President of the United States to insert himself into the unseemly debate over Right to Work. Some asked out loud, doesn't POTUS have more important things to do than lobby Gov. Rick Snyder on that?


But lobby the president did.


During an exclusive one-hour sit down on WKAR-Public TV, the governor confirms that he and President Barack Obama shared a few minutes in private and the president looked the governor in the eye and said, "He wasn't pleased with Right to Work," Mr. Snyder reveals for the first time.


And the governor's response?


Short, sweet and to the point. "I said thank you for sharing that with me."


And that was it?


"Pretty much, yeah," the GOP governor glibly recalls.


Of course the central theme in the story line had the President linking RTW to potential federal dollars for the governor's bridge and the M-1 transit project for downtown Detroit. The speculation was the Democrats wanted Mr. Obama to hint if the governor signed Right to Work, he might not got the federal largess.


But on that point the governor suddenly clammed up when pressed.


Reminded that it would be a good story to report, the governor would have no part of that.


"It's a good story," he conceded but quickly added, "but you can wait for the book" and then he laughs.


The interviewer suggested he might not live that long and asked again for confirmation.


Still no deal.


The stubborn governor noted, "I do this to help the citizens of Michigan, not to make stories."


And then in case anybody missed his point, this coda, "Actually sharing any discussion with the President of the United States, I don't think really moves us forward with the citizens."


So much for that.


End of conversation.


While no one will confirm this, there is no indication that the federal money angle was discussed in the exchange between the two. Which means the "book" will not be nearly as interesting.


See the Evening with the Governor and First Lady Sue Snyder at wkar.org.

An Evening with the Governor 2012


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: michigan; obama; rtw; unions
Sounds like Obama got a well deserved brush off.
1 posted on 12/26/2012 9:36:33 AM PST by cripplecreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Springman; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; madison10; ...
Sounds like Rick Snyder gave Obama a well deserved brush off.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Weekly/biweekly Michigan legislative action thread
2 posted on 12/26/2012 9:40:19 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Snyder is much more polite and restrained than I would have been. IOW, “GFY, punk.”


3 posted on 12/26/2012 9:41:38 AM PST by TADSLOS (I took extra credit at the School of Hard Knocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
While no one will confirm this, there is no indication that the federal money angle was discussed in the exchange between the two. Which means the "book" will not be nearly as interesting

I reached the exact opposite conclusion. If Obama didn't link federal money to the decision, then one of his operatives did prior to Obama discussing RTW with him. Snyder would not say anything if the threat had been made. It remains to be seen if Obama follows thru with some sort of retribution to the state.

4 posted on 12/26/2012 9:42:51 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"I said thank you for sharing that with me."

LOL! A great reply and then Gov. Snyder signed the bills as soon as he could. :-)

5 posted on 12/26/2012 9:46:29 AM PST by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Snyder held all the cards and knew it.

The funny part is the idiot screaming about Obama bacon a few days earlier probably helped Snyder a great deal. He knew Obama couldn’t really withhold funds from Detroit and the GOP has control of those funds and will use them effectively.


6 posted on 12/26/2012 9:49:55 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Lols! It's so much fun watching Ubama get his come uppens!

7 posted on 12/26/2012 9:59:52 AM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion
And then he got slapped by the Michigan GOP.

December 10, 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Matt Frendewey, Director of Communications O: 517-487-5413

Michigan Republican Party chairman Bobby Schostak issued the following statement in response to President Obama’s visit to Michigan today:

“It’s interesting that President Obama has chosen to stop in Michigan to propose his economic recovery plan of higher taxes, more spending and broken budgets. Here in Michigan we’ve seen actual economic recovery by streamlining government, cutting taxes and balancing budgets.

“The President’s divisive message and attack on Michigan workers is just another indication of how out of touch Pres. Obama has become. President Obama’s continued attempt to subvert state rights is an assult on our federal system.

“I encourage the former law professor and our current President brush up on the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, ‘The powers not delegated to the United states by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’

“The President’s stance is a blatant attack on Michigan workers and demonstrates the President’s staunch support of special interest union bosses. Thankfully, Michigan Republican leaders are here to provide a firewall for Michigan workers and their families and to keep Michigan’s turnaround on course.”

8 posted on 12/26/2012 10:08:00 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Professor” Obama should find something to busy himself with back in DC, like read the constitution.


9 posted on 12/26/2012 10:18:56 AM PST by fivecatsandadog (Reality ruins everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

States that have not yet passed right to work laws should instead give the unions more of what they want. It’s patently unfair that maybe 75 votes thirty years closed a shop to union representation and locked today’s workers onto a situation not of their own choosing. Right to work advocates should move to make certification an annual event, voted only from among active current employees by secret ballot. It is the onlynwaynto know if a union is truly serving the needs of its constituents. Our lawmakers stand for reelection, why not unions?


10 posted on 12/26/2012 10:24:22 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

States that have not yet passed right to work laws should instead give the unions more of what they want. It’s patently unfair that maybe 75 votes thirty years closed a shop to union representation and locked today’s workers onto a situation not of their own choosing. Right to work advocates should move to make certification an annual event, voted only from among active current employees by secret ballot. It is the only way to know if a union is truly serving the needs of its constituents. Our lawmakers stand for reelection, why not unions?


11 posted on 12/26/2012 10:25:09 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
'is Majesty Barack the Worst were'nt pleased? Gor-blimey!

Too bad we live in America where we don't have a king, huh?

12 posted on 12/26/2012 10:31:35 AM PST by Feckless (I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

They set some pretty high hurdles for de-certification. I read some SEIU by laws a couple of years ago and it only took 10% to derail a de-certification vote.


13 posted on 12/26/2012 10:33:50 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Snyder missed a golden opportunity. Because the media never asks 0bama any substantive questions, Snyder could have filled this role. Perhaps, he even could have covertly recorded the converstation as well. Snyder would not need to be confrontationl, just ask open ended question explaining the rationale for closed union shops. He could have moved on to other subject such as taxes, debt and gun confiscation. This could have been a treasure trove of information that could be used when needed.


14 posted on 12/26/2012 10:40:26 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Lols! Generalissimo Ubama doesn't need no Tenth Amendment.

Not with a National Security Force, Just as well armed, just as well funded as the Military.


15 posted on 12/26/2012 10:53:54 AM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I would have told the rat b@stard SOB to go intercourse himself.


16 posted on 12/26/2012 1:17:10 PM PST by exnavy (Got ammo, Godspeed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks cripplecreek.


17 posted on 12/26/2012 4:22:04 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Employees may file a petition for decertification (RD) if they believe support for a union has diminished, after collecting signatures from at least 30% of workers in a unit. A majority of votes decides the outcome.

Click the link for a chart of decertification elections and the outcomes from 2001-2010:

http://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/graphs-data/decertification-elections-rd

As you can see from the chart, unions were decertified by a substantial margin in the period portrayed. The process for dececertification is not widely known and is ferociously opposed by the union when it is attempted.


18 posted on 12/26/2012 8:47:35 PM PST by shove_it (the 0bama regime are the people Huxley, Orwell and Rand warned us about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

see #18


19 posted on 12/26/2012 8:57:01 PM PST by shove_it (the 0bama regime are the people Huxley, Orwell and Rand warned us about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson