It does put the size of the debt in perspective, doesn’t it?
On second thought, I’m sticking with “...the cost of it would double, at least, the national debt.”
Remember, this is a federal government program we’re talking about here. When you factor in the cost of pork, graft, corruption and who knows how many new government agencies with all the trappings to carry out the mandate, your $50,000 per gun sounds a tad on the conservative side as an estimate.
At any rate, DiFi’s just flapping her gums. Her legislation would never pass, even in the Senate but it’s been an amusing topic of discussion.
Merry Christmas