Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Scarborough Explodes At Rep. Huelskamp’s Assertion That Newtown Tragedy Is Being ‘Politicized’
Mediaite ^ | 12-21-12 | Meenal Vamburkar

Posted on 12/21/2012 9:36:28 AM PST by Mozilla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Mozilla

Hey Scarborough, we need high capacity magazines to protect ourselves against a tyrannical government and high capacity gang members (for starters). This BS about hunting is just some red herring talking point to take the attention away from the real issue.


41 posted on 12/21/2012 12:08:21 PM PST by crosshairs (It's all about good vs evil. In the end, evil is destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Amazing disconnect from reality over there - they claim to be 'critical thinkers,' and suggest (endlessly) that conservatives are "idiots," but they apparently see nothing wrong with quickly disposing of any part of the Constitution with which they happen to currently disagree.

Absolutely amazing...

42 posted on 12/21/2012 2:58:09 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("We are not insensible that when liberty is in danger, the liberty of complaining is dangerous...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla; All

The fact of the matter is that nobody can show me even a single instance of a school shooting by kids in the 1800’s when:

-there were no background checks

-there were no age limits

-there were no waiting periods

-there were no arbitrary gun restrictions

-guns were much more easily accessible to kids

-gun safes practically did not even exist

-gun locks did not exist at all

-lever action guns in skilled hands can fire almost as fast as a semi auto AR.

Even with all of the omission of restrictions on gun ownership during this time period, still not a single person can show me even a single instance of a school shooting during this time.

It’s the culture stupid......it ain’t the guns.

And the Second Amendment was never about duck hunting or target practice; it was about stopping tyranny from taking hold. The Founding Fathers were very clear on this and this can seen in their opinions (”it is the duty of every man to at all times be armed”-Thomas Jefferson) The Second Amendment was meant to be a checks and balances, so to speak, similar to the three branches of government. It was precisely designed to act as a Sword of Damacles, which hangs over the head over every single politician.

“When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”-Thomas Jefferson


43 posted on 12/21/2012 4:52:34 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Read SCOTUS Castle Rock vs Gonzales before dialing 911!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

You would think the FR Search Engine could find a word like “Huelskamp” in a title. But no. I had to get in from a Google search. Needs work.


44 posted on 12/21/2012 5:34:10 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson