Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge

“I know the policy is well meaning, but I don’t think it would work well. We’d be better off cutting off policies that reward shacking up than we would be trying to help married women.”

Obviously stay married in a conventional marriage. But none of my ideas will see the light of day. The liberals hate them because it means more (high-quality) kids, the conservatives hate them because it means more big-government.

So we watch our society, and country, wither on the vine, until it is too weak to defend itself (30 to 50 years hence). It sucks, but that WILL BE the inevitable outcome (to borrow some words from the old Star Trek).


72 posted on 12/19/2012 4:02:55 PM PST by BobL (Agenda 21...Agenda 21...Agenda 21...Agenda 21...Agenda 21... (whatever the hell that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: BobL

People don’t like your ideas because they suck.


73 posted on 12/19/2012 4:07:56 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind. - John Steinbeck :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: BobL

Let’s flip this around. What if you were to give money to husbands for every child they had.


74 posted on 12/19/2012 4:09:00 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind. - John Steinbeck :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson