Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009
Liberals NEVER think through the consequences of their policies.

The consequences of what policies? Stupid people walking into traffic rather than crossing the street at a marked intersection? What ever happened to "cross at the green, not in between?"

Here's a question for you: A guy takes two bong hits of Maui Wowie and then gets in his car to drive to the local mini-mart for Pringles and Haagen Daz. As required by law, he stops at a red light, but illegally makes a cell phone call. Just as the light turns green, a person illegally steps into the intersection against the light while smoking a cigarette and eating a donut. Notwithstanding the green light, the stoned guy remains stationary while he finishes his cell phone call. However, he is hit in the rear by a sober, designated driver with two drunk people in the car, one of whom has an illegal open container. The impact pushes the stoned driver into the guy illegally crossing the street, who sufferes a fatal injury. Which person is at fault and how does the government classify the death?

45 posted on 12/18/2012 8:50:25 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Labyrinthos
Who cares what the government thinks? The victims family don't.

Ya go after the deepest pockets, and or sue them all since nearly everyone had a percentage of fault. In fact, in the real world, look closely at the cops investigation, as they too might be liable for conducting an inadequate investigation where pertinent facts were omitted or not followed up etc.

66 posted on 12/18/2012 11:15:04 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson