Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A_perfect_lady
If you start with the assumption that God *must* be involved, you won't see it.

Conversely, if you start with the assumption that God *can't* be involved, you won't see Him.

21 posted on 12/17/2012 12:57:28 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: ShadowAce

If you have to believe before you can see, there might be a problem with what you are looking at.


23 posted on 12/17/2012 1:08:09 PM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

And by the way, you don’t have to start with the assumption that God *can’t* be involved. Just consider the possibility that he isn’t. Can you come up with a rational explanation without Him? I can. If I can come up with a rational explanation that doesn’t require a supernatural element, that is more efficient and more likely than an explanation that does.


25 posted on 12/17/2012 1:13:58 PM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson