Canada Ping!
Posted on 12/16/2012 2:21:08 PM PST by jazusamo
Obama is determined that this oil goes to Red China. So be it.
They may as well ask that the question of life after death be settled.
Or, do animals have souls, and if so; which species?
Climate change??? WTF?
This project was DOA from day one.
Let me guess. The “critics” want to conduct the “study” with government grants and want to take 5 to 10 years to complete it.
Build the pipeling to within a few feet of the border in both directions. Build a giant fill station on the Canadian side and a giant dump area on the US side and let giant shuttle trucks take the crude across the border. SCREW the SOS!
Its a jobs program.
Meanwhile, when is BO going to decrease his carbon footprint?
Lets have a bit of compassion for the Luddites among us.
Remember it was they and their ‘scientists’ who stated with
absolute authority that humans in an open car driving over
30 miles per hour would have their heads fly off.
A GREEN jobs program and they want to use OUR green to fund it.
So these morons haven't figured out Canada will produce whether or not we have the XL pipeline?
Sending the Canadian oil to China is part of Obama’s plan, but it will happen whether they build the Keystone pipeline or not. They already have a pipeline that sends the oil south to Vancouver, BC and Cherry Point, WA, and Anacortes, WA. The Anacortes destination is a Tesoro refinery that was over-hauled to refine the Canadian tar sands oil and is now concerned that their supply will be decreased due to the planned shipments to China.
The Cherry Point pipeline outlet is right near the dock that the Obama administration wants to send sub-bituminous coal to China. Now, with sub-bituminous coal selling for $12.35 / ton, it doesn’t make much sense to build this huge dock, unless there is a plan to also make it an oil shipment dock. China has already applied for the permit to double the capacity of the oil shipments to the southern leg of the trans-Canadian pipeline.
None of this means that they couldn’t still ship the oil to the Gulf Coast. Oh, and one more interesting point, the over-all global warming study is the demand that the opponents of the coal terminal are making. The addition of the tar sands oil to the study is in case they are planning to add the tar sands oil to the Cherry Point Coal terminal.
I wouldn’t mind having the oil, but I sure don’t want the filthy coal in my backyard.
Ping.
I think O will approve the pipeline. He’s not up for re-election and he doesnt’ need the environmentalists any longer. Let’s be honest. He’s a black man. Do blacks have ANYTHING in common with the environuts? Do the unions and their need for union construction jobs need the enviros? The pipeline will help O’s economic bottom line and it’s about time that the rat coalition gets exposed for what it is: a LOOSE coalition of different interests.
I believe they are more then happy to see the oil go to the ChiComs.
i.e. an assessment with a predetermined outcome.
Yup! That’s the problem with “studies” these days. The desired outcome is determined and they work backwards from there.
Canada Ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.