ignore the USSC/Congress...like he always has...
He's a Marxist Dictator.
malignant narcissistic marxist ideologue with a messianic complex.
torpid low-class member of the Nomeklatura
Posted on 12/15/2012 9:35:32 PM PST by Nachum
What is all this c$$p about having a “conversation.” What they want is not talk. They want confiscation of all long guns other than bolt actions and muzzleloaders. And stamping of ammunition for the remaining guns to make it prohibitively expensive.
But I guess some focus group somewhere told them to call it a conversation.
What’s hard about “shall not be infringed” ???
Holders main problem seems to be his lack of willingness to answer questions. He had no problem being ot front of the Jorge Zimmerman issue. Just the words of a dishonest racist, disregard.
I wonder if the Sandy Hook weapons are traced to FAST and FURIOUS if that would embarass the MSM to cover the story?
My first “hard question” is, why isn’t Holder in prison?
ditto
The only hard question Holder needs to ask is this, “Am I ready to kill thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of his people to kill thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of those damn bitter clingers?”. We are all waiting for his answer.
Like anyone cares what Holder says.
He is merely Obama’s puppet, he says what Obama tells him to say.
“COME AND TAKE IT”
This is Eric Holder! 2nd amendment is an obstacle which must be removed.
One question I would have is why these events keep occurring in supposedly gun-free areas.
Sure thing! Right after you tell us why you murdered American border agents, eh?
Two reasons they won’t ban the drugs.
First: Money. The majority of the type of SSRI drugs sold are sold in the US. By a large margin. The Pharma corps have been pushing for more, not less, sold.
Second: If we don’t drug up these people, there has to be a way to control and treat them. For many, that means an asylum or something similar. The public would rather that not happen.
After they ban all guns, and I fear they will, you will see knife and large vehicle attacks.
I wonder how many kids are killed each year in auto accidents/biking accidents/ etc. I bet it’s way above the gun toll.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Seems to me that the last clause of that is sacrosanct if and only if the first one is also sacrosanct.
“A well regulated Militia”
In those four words, the Second Amendment does suggest there should be some kind of concept of what’s “well regulated”.
In my lifetime there have been four incidents of spree killing in Britain - Monkseaton, Cumbria, Hungerford and Dunblane. This is worth pointing out to the gun control advocates who’re fixated on the “thirty times as many deaths per capita in USA” statistic. Even though we’re major league controllers, these things still happen because we can still own firearms legally.
However, the British gun control advocates have the false premise that if we just did what Japan has done it’d solve the problem. It wouldn’t. Because in all four cases of spree shootings the failures weren’t in firearms control, there were some pretty obvious concerns about the mental states of the gunmen which weren’t dealt with. Whether they had legally owned weapons or illegally owned weapons is irrelevent. It’s a red herring.
Most of those kinds of guy didn’t spontaneously “snap”, they were on the wrong side of fruitloop for weeks if not months or years before they went on their rampages. The answer wasn’t to limit everyone elses’ access to firearms, it was to have their mental health issues spotted and dealt with.
But in the UK, as in the USA, I think there’s an awful tendency for people to “walk on by” even when they can see that someone in their own community is in serious - and I do mean serious - need of immediate help. And if people will “walk on by” when someone’s in the street bleeding, you can bet your boots they’ll also “walk on by” when that person’s having some kind of a mental breakdown.
Even good samaritans often can’t cross the street fast enough these days. They don’t want to “interfere” because all they get for trying to help is a bunch of grief.
That’s the problem.
you can’t just confine people because they have behavior
issues unless those issues rise to the level of crime.
Holder is not one of us.
WHAT PART OF SHALL NOT INFRINGE DO THEY NOT UNDER STAND!
Last time I read the US Constitution these are STILL MY RIGHTS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.