Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notabunny

I’m pretty sure last month’s election is a testament to Scott Brown’s popularity
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
???
I don’t care who one may be.
If you can’t beat someone who was exposed to be not only a liar, but someone who has been defrauding the people since her college days, isn’t a good test for your popularity.

That is why I was surprised the R’s put up McMahan’s wife again. She couldn’t beat a lying sack of $h-1 Poseur who has been enhancing his resume for years.


11 posted on 12/15/2012 9:00:04 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98 "It is virtually impossible to clean the pond as long as the pigs are still crapping in it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: xrmusn

I agree. Brown should have won. He was the incumbent and had the experience, he had the name recognition, he had the popularity, he had a spectacularly well funded campaign, he had every imaginable advantage, but he lost to a novice who never even sat on a City Counsel. I think Republicans are mistaken if they believe Brown can come back from that embarrassing defeat and win against a Kennedy in Massachusetts.


14 posted on 12/15/2012 9:17:11 PM PST by Notabunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson