[I cannot think of a name]

Of course, these same nutballs have already had the Supreme Court UPHOLD their RIGHT of freedom of speech when they were doing this at the services for our military killed in action.

It is always a sign that your civilization is on a rocket ship to hell when the Supreme Court of the land can find:

A right of privacy exists for a parent to destroy a child.

But no right of privacy exists for a parent to bury a child (even when said child has died in the service of our country).

Not even the Mad Hatter would attempt to explain this!

[Mr. Silverback]

A right of privacy exists for a parent to destroy a child. But no right of privacy exists for a parent to bury a child (even when said child has died in the service of our country).

Well said.