“2. They couldn’t use the war on women bs”
Didn’t you watch them use that very topic against Palin (because of her pro-life stance)? The number of white women who opted instead for the mulatto and white guys (Obama/Biden) showed just how successfully it was used against Palin in particular (McCain was no threat to anybody but himself).
“4. Palin has it.”
She would be touted as the loser of any debates she won just to keep her down in the polls.
“only chance again in 2016 is if we get a depression”
We already have one; it didn’t help because the media just repeated for four years that things were just fine...
Americans are stupid people.
If Sarah would have run against Obama as the nominee she would have won. Millions of conservatives stayed home instead of voting for Romney. Palin would have driven conservative voter turnout through the roof higher than ever imo and not depressed it as Romney did. And some women who voted for Obama wouldn’t have. Not a doubt in my mind Sarah would have won if she had run.
If Sarah would have run against Obama as the nominee she would have won. Millions of conservatives stayed home instead of voting for Romney. Palin would have driven conservative voter turnout through the roof higher than ever imo and not depressed it as Romney did. And some women who voted for Obama wouldnt have. Not a doubt in my mind Sarah would have won if she had run.
come on you are kidding right. you actually think Sarah Palin would not have had untold millions more voters than a rich white male liberal mormon , named Romney? She would have beat Obama . bank on it. the media wanted Romney to run against cause of that , that he was a white male, better that he was rich , better that we was a liberal running in the GOP , better that he was a mormon, perfect candidate to beat in the election so the media knocked out cain etc.