You really can’t read at all, can you. I mean seriously, you can’t comprehend two or three words in sequence and figure out what they mean when you get to the end.
You have not correctly identified my position in a single one of your posts. You have not acknowledged a single bit of common ground, even though I’ve pointed them out numerous times. You are more interested in a masturbative fight than you are a discussion. So go close your door, and do it with yourself.
You know, something with a snowball's chance in hell of being enacted or enforced?
In reviewing your posts to me I don't really see any position that you have taken other than that you agree with Glenn Beck (I guess that means that you think Homosexual Marriage is not all that bad) and that you believe that social issues such as that are best resolved at the state level. You may correct me if I misunderstood your alleged position, but since you never really elaborated on your position and spent the last few posts just either laughing off my position or attempting to insult my intelligence, I can't really say that I know what your position is.
Ok, perhaps you think I can't comprehend what you say, but perhaps it is because your posts are so esoteric and above the intelligence of us common people that they are incomprehensible.
I pointed out that attacking the social issues on a State Level without also focusing the attack on the Federal Level is a losing proposition in that anything done on the State Level is doomed without a Federal law protecting the states from interference from other states or from the Federal Government itself. I proposed 4 specific laws which would accomplish that and you laughed them off. But without those laws, it is clear that no state law addressing social issues can be valid unless there is a waiver by congress of the Full Faith and Credit clause and the privileges and immunities clause (and a redefinition of the 14th Amendment). But you seem to think that because North Carolina passed some social legislation that this was somehow a victory for us all. But as with California's laws, it will be challenged and rendered impotent if not invalid.
So if you think I have misunderstood your position, then maybe you can enlighten us as to just what your position actually is (without all the esoteric bull$#!+) so that us common folks can understand it and not misconstrue it as some kind of veiled attempt to surrender the whole Federal Battlefield on the culture war.
The ball is in your court. So run with it or punt.