Posted on 12/10/2012 7:21:08 AM PST by bayouranger
During Egyptian presidential elections, one of the biggest criticisms against President Mohammed Morsi was that he was just a stooge for the Muslim Brotherhoods Supreme Guide, Mohammed Badie who recently called for a jihad on Israel.
The logic was that Morsis function was simply to fulfill the Guides will, which is the absolute Islamization of Egypt. Of course, the Brotherhood and Morsi brushed aside such talk, saying the latter was his own man, that his policies for Egypt would have nothing to do with Brotherhood interests, that he was a president for all Egyptians, etc., etc.
Amazingly, however, a couple days ago on Egyptian satellite TV, a Muslim Brotherhood official actually admitted that Yes, the Supreme Guide rules Morsi. Here is the Arabic video.
The discussion was in the context of the ongoing protests against the Sharia-pushing president. At one point, the MB official said The people are calling for the fall of the Supreme Guides rule and the fall of Morsi, to which the host interrupted him, saying What, does the Supreme Guide rule?
The MB official responded: Yes, the Supreme Guide rules Muhammad Morsi.
The host, visibly amazed, made a gesture of resignation and said, Well thats it; its over; what else is there to say "
-- Raymond Ibrahim
United States Commission on religious Freedom
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 7, 2012 | By USCIRF
The Egyptian Constituent Assembly on November 30 approved a draft constitution that includes problematic provisions limiting freedom of religion or belief for all Egyptians.
The constitution was drafted without a balanced representation of all the Egyptian constituencies; as a result the religious freedom provisions of the draft constitution are deeply flawed. If approved by referendum, the draft would enshrine into law one groups view of religion that could severely limit religious freedom for Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The draft also would undermine the goals of the January 25, 2011 revolution, which many saw as the first step toward a new day for rights and liberties in Egypt after decades of dictatorship, said USCIRF Chair Katrina Lantos Swett. The draft text favors an interpretation of one conservative school of Sunni Islam above all others and fails to provide for full conscience protections, for Muslims, non-Muslims, and dissidents. Furthermore, religious communities not considered among the divine would be deprived of their religious freedoms.
Hasty passage of the draft constitution concluded a contentious process. The major Islamic institution in Egypt, Al-Azhar, the Constitutional Court, as well as many liberal, Christian, minority and dissenting representatives abandoned the process, voicing concerns that the process was flawed, the representation not balanced, and the draft not reflective of the principles of freedom. The document is scheduled for a popular referendum on December 15.
The Egyptian people have a unique opportunity to lay the foundations for a prosperous and stable society that builds upon the talents of all their citizens, regardless of faith or belief, continued Lantos Swett. Unfortunately, this draft suffers from many procedural and substantive deficiencies, and if it were to become law would set the stage for more not fewer religious freedom violations and sow the seeds of discord among the Egyptian people, as well as future uncertainty, instability, and insecurity.
For Egypt to achieve lasting stability, it must fully respect the rule of law and comply with international human rights standards including freedom of religion or belief. USCIRF recommended in 2012 that the U.S. government designate Egypt a country of particular concern (CPC) because of the particularly severe violations of religious freedom perpetrated or tolerated by the government, such as discrimination, intolerance and violence committed against religious minorities and disfavored Muslims.
For an initial analysis of problematic provisions in the Egyptian draft constitution, go to: http://www.uscirf.gov/reports-and-briefs/special-reports.html.
Nomen est Omen
I think they’ve got a pretty good grip on the sentiments of old Jug Ears as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.