Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservative Actuary

I’m not defending any policy I am addressing the reality of cutting those benefits. When all you have are straw men arguments and ad-hominems it means you have nothing of substance or simply have no interest in discussing the substance.


71 posted on 12/09/2012 3:05:11 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
If you are willing to accept that Medicare is welfare and our goal should be to completely repeal it. Then I agree that their are real practical issues about how to accomplish that. That is also why it will now be next to impossible to repeal ObamaCare because people will become dependent on it, just like people are dependent on SS or MediCare.

That is why in a few years people will be making the same argument for ObamaCare that we can’t repeal ObamaCare because my “Insert Relative Here” is paying X% of their income on insurance already and that will go up if they didn’t have ObamaCare and how will they survive.

That is why practically the GOP should be pushing for raising the eligibility age, means testing and privatization to overtime eliminate the programs.

You are the one that made the argument about you by brining up your mother, I simply responded to the argument you made. Plus you are the one who called my comment “dumb” so I don’t really think you want to claim my arguments invalid because of ad hominiem logic.

82 posted on 12/09/2012 3:23:18 PM PST by Conservative Actuary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson