Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beck, Marriage and The State of The Union
Townhall,com ^ | December 8, 2012 | Ken Blackwell

Posted on 12/08/2012 5:28:00 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2012 5:28:09 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Glenn has looked at the numbers and is going along to get along.

There is no such thing as gay marriage. They may make it legal but it is only a farce.Treat it as such.

NEVER accept it.


2 posted on 12/08/2012 5:41:06 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Great Read!

Traditional marriage is one of the few area’s that government should be involved in.

3 posted on 12/08/2012 5:45:05 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadows of the Almighty Psalm 91:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

God gave us a promise in 11 Corinthians 7:14. We casually say, “GOD Bless America”...only to just live our lives casually without being true to His Word.

Unless Christians wake up and turn to God through Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior, turn from our wicked ways we will continue to live without God healing our land. It starts with individuals and goes up to God not the other way around.

Sad thing is we have got a Supreme Court and lower courts that are redefining the law of the land AND going against laws that a majority have voted to uphold all the while a warring minority decide to disavow.


4 posted on 12/08/2012 5:46:03 AM PST by YouGoTexasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

a farce

Indeed.
It’s just laughable!


5 posted on 12/08/2012 5:47:19 AM PST by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl
The problem is way too many apathetic Christians. I was not a great fan of Jerry Falwell, but we sure could use him now.
6 posted on 12/08/2012 5:53:05 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadows of the Almighty Psalm 91:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Children need and children have a right to the married love of a mother and father.

Where is this in the Constitution?

Where is "marriage" in the Constitution?

7 posted on 12/08/2012 5:54:54 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl
AND going against laws that a majority have voted to uphold

Four states had gay marriage measures on their ballots last month.

Three voted to allow it. The fourth voted against prohibiting it.

8 posted on 12/08/2012 5:58:39 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

Exactly


9 posted on 12/08/2012 6:01:33 AM PST by Kaslin ( One Big Ass Mistake America (Make that Two))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl

Very well said


10 posted on 12/08/2012 6:03:11 AM PST by Kaslin ( One Big Ass Mistake America (Make that Two))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Where is "marriage" in the Constitution?

Heck, I'm still trying to figure out where liberals found sodomy in the Constitution.

11 posted on 12/08/2012 6:08:32 AM PST by deoetdoctrinae (Gun free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Are you saying just because it is not in the Constitution children do not need and do not have the right to the love of a married father and father? It sure looks that way


12 posted on 12/08/2012 6:08:44 AM PST by Kaslin ( One Big Ass Mistake America (Make that Two))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nobody is making the essential legal argument...

Reynolds v. United States (1878) defined marriage as one man and one woman.


13 posted on 12/08/2012 6:12:04 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m most ignorant about Mormonism. I’m not sure I’ve ever even known a Mormon.

Can someone point me to the place in the Bible where having multiple wives is sanctioned? (I’m not a Biblical scholar, either.......)


14 posted on 12/08/2012 6:12:16 AM PST by basil (Second Amendment Sisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
Can someone point me to the place in the Bible where having multiple wives is sanctioned?

Try the entire OT. History of Abraham and Jacob, etc.

15 posted on 12/08/2012 6:14:15 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: deoetdoctrinae
Heck, I'm still trying to figure out where liberals found sodomy in the Constitution.

There are a lot of things Liberals want to imply are in the Constitution or covered under some completely unrelated Right or clause. Conservatives should not engage in the same re-interpretation game.

Marriage is not mentioned, defined, or specified as a Right in the Constitution. The Government should stay out of it and not provide special benefits, services, or tax rates to Citizens/residents based on their state of singlehood, co-habitation, or wedlock.

16 posted on 12/08/2012 6:23:16 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

The government got into the marriage business in the 1920’s. It’s really none of their business, just another way to raise more money and regulate the people. Before this it was generally through a church.

Oh ya, it was originally to stop mixed race marriages, from Wikipedia- In the 1920s, they were used by 38 states to prohibit whites from marrying blacks, mulattos, Japanese, Chinese, Indians, Mongolians, Malays or Filipinos without a state approved license.

Gotta love progressivism.


17 posted on 12/08/2012 6:28:01 AM PST by foundedonpurpose (It's time for a fundamental restoration, of our country's principles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Are you saying just because it is not in the Constitution children do not need and do not have the right to the love of a married father and father?

Marriage is not the Government's business to encourage or enforce.

And no, children don't have a legal or human "right" to the love of a married mother/father or any other numerical multiple thereof. If so, children could sue their biological parents who never marry, divorce, or re-marry as a violation of their "right."

The Government is failing miserably to uphold and defend the actual Rights we do have. Let's not imply rights as part of a fictional "social contract" for Govt to waste scarce time and resources on.

18 posted on 12/08/2012 6:38:10 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Can someone point me to the place in the Bible where having multiple wives is sanctioned?

Try the entire OT. History of Abraham and Jacob, etc.


NOWHERE in the Old Testament did God sanction multiple wives. Men did it in their own disobedience.
19 posted on 12/08/2012 6:41:25 AM PST by time4good
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

“There is no such thing as gay marriage.” — Exactly. It is, as you say, a farce. Like someone saying “I’m a horse,” and expecting others to affirm such silliness.


20 posted on 12/08/2012 6:41:35 AM PST by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson