[GeronL]

It’s his HOUSE and his son was there with him at the illegal pot growing operation.

That is why I surmise that his son was with him at the illegal pot growing operation.

Because he was.

[APatientMan]

So you’re making it up. Thanks.

[presently no screen name]

It’s his HOUSE and his son was there with him at the illegal pot growing operation. I surmise that his son was with him at the illegal pot growing operation. Because he was.

Did you, also, surmise the son HAD to be in the attic? After all, it's in the house.

The homeowner should/may be fined and probation for growing it illegally (that's his crime) but you want him in jail for life. Originally, you said it was a farm while the article states attic. Why the need to embellish against the homeowner? Isn't it bad enough?