Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy; little jeremiah
girls are simply as a rule...and we base our military projection on rules not exceptions...girls are more emotionally soft...they will fold quicker and in greater numbers and have a harder time with decisions and do not as a rule...command as well

You are making the case for relieving them of the vote. Your points taken at face arguendo point to repeal of the XXth Amendment and disenfranchisement for the good of society.

Feminism is the long played out revenge of women who in my youth would likely have not married but instead become school teachers or administrators...the province then of single women...nurses tended to marry... and they want get back

I'll pass on that for now, but I would add that we know feminism's source: Betty Friedan. She, it turns out, was a Communist propaganda writer for the Electricians' union newspaper -- they were the biggest Red union in America. She was a Communist for years before she ever sat down and started writing about "feminism".

Knowing that she was a Communist and a professional propagandist in her youth, that's all one needs to know about her motive in elaborating a society-rending concept of "feminism". She was an enemy, and she got to the girls and hurt us as a nation by misleading and agitating many millions of them.

But the question I have is, how many women, even here on FR, home of brave and strong and clear-eyed women, would be willing to give up the franchise, and jury and military duty, in order to neutralize the Fifth Column of Red feminazis and their follower-horde? Who by the way just elected the Communist jihadist and homosexual Obama to a second term, and put him within reach of dictatorship?

59 posted on 12/08/2012 6:14:41 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus; wardaddy

Thanks for the ping, LG - I just have not been doing my pinging duty very well lately; overcome by the nightmare...

I have already stated my position - I’d give up my vote if it meant millions of idiot females had to give up theirs! I’ve told about my introduction to feminism in Berkeley, circa 1969. SHort version:

I was a typical crazy hippie, had a room mate who was about 10 years older (another young woman) who invited me to some “womens’ liberation” meetings. Heck, I’d been to Altamont, Steve Gaskin meetings, took LSD about every other day - I was game for anything. They had free dope passed around so that was sort of interesting. Then by the second or third meeting (I just sat in the corner not participating, just kind of listening) they all started ranting and raving and screeching about EEEEEVIL patriarchical society, EEEEEVIL men, and how they all lusted for other women.

That was it, I realized even in my state of mental aberration that feminism was unnatural, evil, and hateful in every way. Then later my female room mate admitted she lusted for women (me!) and that was the dingleberry on the crap cake.

I am so anti-feminism it ain’t funny.

Doesn’t mean a Jeanne D’Arc can’t show up every now and then - look at Ann Barnhardt. But they are the exception. I didn’t know about jury duty - was that added when the vote was?

I’d also want literacy test, and perhaps property owner, for voting. My thoughts are not set in stone, but the way it is now has led us directly do not pass Go, to hell.


60 posted on 12/08/2012 9:39:36 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson