Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nita Nupress
You make a very good argument for trying to defeat the GOPe from within instead of doing the 3rd party bit.

Thank you for the kind remarks. Unfortunately, staying with the GOPers now, for the intention of defeating them from within, is not a terribly popular idea right now.

Seemingly, there is more enthusiasm for punishing the GOPe than there is for seizing the party and using it as a vessel for advancing conservatism.

And since I think it’s now inevitable that we’re going to crash & burn, part of me just wants to hurry up and get it over with. Why prolong the inevitable?

Isn't that akin to saying that, if rape is inevitable, you would lie back and enjoy it?

Somehow, I don't think so.

Among conservatives, fatalism is another popular attitude toward the liberal hegemony these days. I wonder if we can afford it....

100 posted on 12/16/2012 6:22:54 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
I don't think the Republican Party needs to be abandoned. Nor does it need to be blindly supported. Instead, in a manner akin to Grover Norquist's no tax pledge, lovers of liberty need to work out a simple pledge to support the US Constitution and require candidates to support it. If those candidates feel the need to run under the umbrella of the GOP, that's fine - they should not be penalized for adopting a label. If those candidates decide to run as Libertarians or Independents, then likewise - the label is not important. The pledge is.

When a candidate decides to support unconstitutional legislation, or backs a huge and horrible bill because there is something in it he likes, he loses the support of the lovers of liberty. Maybe the GOP can save him, maybe they won't both. We don't care. We'll be supporting the next candidate who does.

The GOP is just a tool. We can use it, sometimes, when necessary. But all of our candidates need to oppose unconstitutional legislation and administrative overreach as a first principle, whatever label they choose to adopt.

101 posted on 12/16/2012 7:18:17 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: okie01

“Isn’t that akin to saying that, if rape is inevitable, you would lie back and enjoy it?”

Sometimes you just can’t fix stupid, not even with duct tape. With so many Americans now willing to support a Marxist because they lack the mental and/or emotional intelligence to discern what is happening, it’s just a matter of time before the remaining freedom-lovers must make a choice. It’s that simple. In addition to our own home-grown Takers, within the next few years we’ll have a huge influx of immigrants from the south who will be more than willing to participate in the Obamaclause charade.

You call it fatalism — I call it realism. ;)


102 posted on 12/16/2012 9:07:20 PM PST by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson