Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck

[[Once you did something that indicated you WANTED the benefit of publicity, you’d be hard pressed to retract that.]]

Well that brings us back to the al sharpton brawley case too- I think she went public but still was able to win the case, or am i mistaken? and again, once he becomes public, that’s one thing, but the damage ahd already been doen to him as a private citizen as he was already livign in fear for his life and for his families life because of the slanderous hateful racist maLIcious ... let’s call them what they were... attacks by the msm

[[they aren’t always fathomable by the average duffer.]]

I’m a doofus, not a duffer


67 posted on 12/06/2012 9:59:49 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

Which might either mean the lies were believed to be based in such egregious malice that being public didn’t matter, or the person was only hounded into becoming public and didn’t want to be. But like I said, it keeps lawyers in lobster. You can’t just show up at, say, a small claims court, make the claim, and walk out a few cool thousand richer in fifteen minutes.


69 posted on 12/06/2012 10:05:46 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson