Zimmerman: No you go in straight through the entrance and then you make a left…uh
you go straight in, don’t turn, and make a left. Shit he’s running.
Dispatcher: He’s running? Which way is he running?
Zimmerman: Down towards the other entrance to the neighborhood.
Dispatcher: Which entrance is that that he’s heading towards?
Zimmerman: The back entrance…fucking [unintelligible]
Dispatcher: Are you following him?
Zimmerman: Yeah
Dispatcher: Ok, we don’t need you to do that.
Zimmerman: Ok
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/326700/full-transcript-zimmerman.pdf
and at 2:22 here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9A-gp8mrdw
vs
page 11 here: http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/nbc/complaint.pdf
In the complaint he is swearing to the facts of the case, and in this case, exactly what he said. The tape is inconclusive, therefore, he can't swear what he said other than what is in the official transcript.
The complaint and the transcripts are quoted accurately (too include profanity), so I see nothing nefarious in including what was actually understood and heard and omitting a single unintelligible comment that he can't recall and the media can't decipher. Indeed, like you in any number of situations, Zimmerman simply can't recall word-for-word what was said in a highly stressful encounter and the resulting confusion that followed.
Consequently, that comment is omitted because it is not understandable and cannot be swore to. It is listed as "unintelligible" in the transcripts.
Therefore, the suggested comments you inserted earlier I cannot hear and they have no place.
Final note: Deliberate editing to change a meaning is far from merely omitting an unintelligible comment that does not change the facts.