Philadelphia has entire precincts with no whites, no Republicans, no Libertarians ~ and you are surprised Romney didn’t get any votes there?
If this is true overall then statistically Romney should have gotten some votes even in Philadelphia.
Not to mention just plain old error should have produced a vote or two for Romney. This is a major tell. It wasn't just in one place but many places. That signals fraud.
Philadelphia has entire precincts with no whites, no Republicans, no Libertarians ~ and you are surprised Romney didn’t get any votes there?
****************************************
When you have voter rolls that haven’t been cleaned up in many decades and one of every 6 Americans moves each year you have no explaination except election fraud to explain how with AT MOST 65-70% of the names on the poll list being valid ,, and with a 60% turnout .. it is HIGHLY SUSPECT if you get more than 45% of the roll turnout... That leaves the RAT precinct captains all day to manufacture vote cards to assign to the unused names (assuming they weren’t filled out weeks before).
There were NO 100% Romney precincts in the entire country ,, best he did was 97.x% in one tiny Texas district ... that is statistically what you would expect.
As to the 110% turnout 100% Obama Filthadelphia and Ohio districts that doesn’t match with the 4-5% non-Obama vote from Holders people ... I could believe 96% , 97% even 99% but not 100.00% from each precinct... some black people actually do vote ideology rather than skin color.