Yes, I was surprised my browser held still and deadpan on this one.
There were two aspects of this article in my mind when I posted.
1) The new information (new to me anyway) about Manning’s gender identity disorder. Which is quite a different matter that him simply being “gay”.
2) The showcasing, so to speak, of gender identity disorder and the resultant confusion as exemplified by the author.
It is a very informative article, if not exactly in the way the author intended it.