Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justiceseeker93

I think you are referring to the Gallup polls ~ and this last year they were biased beyond belief ~ possibly inadvertently, but maybe vertently! Anybody who’s been making business decisions based on Gallup data probably ought to reconsider ~ seriously ~ check http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2965660/posts?page=155#155


61 posted on 12/05/2012 2:05:19 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
I think you are referring to the Gallup polls ~ and this last year they were biased beyond belief ~ possibly inadvertently, but maybe vertently!

I was referring to Gallup, among others (including Rasmussen and internal GOP polls), which had Romney with a slim lead in the national popular vote the day before the election. Considering that Gallup's bias is usually in favor of the 'Rats, a slim Romney lead even in Gallup might logically be interpreted as a slightly larger lead in real life. Only problem is that Gallup, nor anyone else doing the polling, had any mechanism for accounting for the Dummyfraud seen on a larger basis than in previous presidential elections.

No wonder why the Romney campaign insiders were reported as "shellshocked" when the alleged vote totals came in on election night.

79 posted on 12/05/2012 7:47:50 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson