Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I can’t remember, but ... isn’t this the second or third case Kagan has not taken part in ?


2 posted on 12/04/2012 5:32:30 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: knarf
I can’t remember, but ... isn’t this the second or third case Kagan has not taken part in ?

There have been many in which she was disqualified because she worked on the case as as a Government lawyer.

12 posted on 12/04/2012 6:07:25 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: knarf
Justice Elena Kagan who did not take part in the case

She must have had an important appointment at the nail salon. She certainly wouldn't recuse herself for anything approaching integrity.

19 posted on 12/04/2012 6:49:45 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: knarf

... isn’t this the second or third case Kagan has not taken part in ?

It may not necessarily be because she recused herself. IINM, if a Justice is not present for the oral argument in a given case (for any reason), s/he may not take part (vote) in the decision on that case.


30 posted on 12/05/2012 8:55:25 AM PST by eddiespaghetti ((with the meatball eyes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson