I think Marbury is right, and if judicial review is not implied by the judicial power at least it can be rationalized on a supremacy basis. The thing is that case didn’t establish finality. For federal purposes, maybe. It doesn’t touch the propriety of state or jury nullification.
It doesn’t touch the propriety of state or jury nullification.
That's an area I don't really know much about. I suspect (but I need to research) that some of this was covered in SCOTUS cases from the early 1800s, but again, I'd have to look it up.
I admit you've worn me down in that if the SC law raises new law on these issues, it may have some value.