To some Christianity is a reality, others a theology. The Adam gets much grief for his sin. Yes, he is the first recorded sinner of this flesh age. However, the greater sin committed by the devil took place in what Peter calls the world that was. Adam's flesh is what died, there is no record that he was damned to hell to be destroyed from within forever for his sin. Whereas, the devil has already been judged to death before this flesh age was set into motion. (Genesis 1:3)
And you're saying it's impossible that Genesis 1 is a macro and Genesis 2 is a retelling of Day 6? Do Genesis 1 and 2 Contradict Each Other?
Again I did not write Genesis. The Heavenly Father elected Moses who was born long after the events of the creation story. So what Moses put down until he was educated enough to write his own biography would have come directly from the Heavenly Father.
The first time I heard about DNA and what it could tell about a person, I knew there was no way that all peoples could come from only two people. I see the need to macro Genesis 1 and 2 child's play, as if God did not know what He had Moses pen. Even worldly history describes the time of hunter/gathers before agriculture became a recognized method of livelihood. What is the big deal with God saying to His children He created on the 6th day they were hunter/gathers with dominion over the earth's creatures designated and then He rested the 7th day stating after that 'day', there was no man to till the ground? Was God confused about what He had created or maybe just maybe He knew exactly what He was saying, knowing full well there would be plenty of Adam's coming down through the generations who choose to ignore His time line.
Occam's razor is not friendly to the hypothesis you're advancing.
Occam nor his razor is mentioned in the whole of the Bible by name or instrument.
How sad that you think there's a difference between Christian theology and Christian reality.
I see the need to macro Genesis 1 and 2 child's play, as if God did not know what He had Moses pen.
No, it's just telling two parts of the same story. No one points at a history of WWII and a history of the battle of Midway and says they are in contradiction. If Genesis 1 describes the Creation Week and Genesis 2 describes a portion of that week, they don't contradict each other or any other part of the Bible. If they describe what you say they do, they contradict parts of the New Testament that teach individual sin as coming into the world with Adam and call him the first man.
Even worldly history describes the time of hunter/gathers before agriculture became a recognized method of livelihood.
You're judging your Bible by the world's thoughts instead of the other way around.
Occam nor his razor is mentioned in the whole of the Bible by name or instrument.
True, but that doesn't mean the concept is unbiblical or anti-biblical any more than the fact that you and I are communicating in a language with completely different syntax rules than Hebrew and Greek is unbiblical.
The Bible does mention truth a lot, though. And it says that sin was introduced through Adam (1 Cor 15:22) and that he was the first human being. You say otherwise. Who do you think I will put my trust in?