So your premise is that the antibiotic resistance existed before the antibiotic was invented? An interesting, if idiotic, supposition. At least you are consistent!
And evolution explains it how?
An interesting, if idiotic, supposition. At least you are consistent!
By your own words you are condemned.
If antibiotic resistance were not somehow *programmed* in by evolution, then no bacteria would have survived to become antibiotic resistance.
So the creationist premise is that antibiotic resistance was programmed in by the Creator.
The evolutionary premise is that it just happened.
*It just happened*? How scientific is that?
And evolution explains it how?
An interesting, if idiotic, supposition. At least you are consistent!
By your own words you are condemned.
If antibiotic resistance were not somehow *programmed* in by evolution, then no bacteria would have survived to become antibiotic resistance.
So the creationist premise is that antibiotic resistance was programmed in by the Creator.
The evolutionary premise is that it just happened.
*It just happened*? How scientific is that?
Let me guess, *Once upon a time a mutation occurred that would make bacteria be antibiotic resistant before antibiotics were invented, and so this mutation just hung around for millions to billions of years and meanwhile spread through the gene pool waiting in breathless anticipation for the day when mankind would invent antibiotics so it could express itself.*