Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul of the South
I took the liberty to copy your excellent comments from The Insourcing Boom thread.

Until the early 1970’s the US had the largest and most efficient manufacturing infrastructure in the world. American products were known for quality. American industry was highly innovative. American industry landed men on the moon.

Until the 1960’s American manufacturing companies were led by executives from the “product” side of the business. They either came up the ladder through sales and marketing and understood how to design and develop innovative new products. Or, they came up through manufacturing and engineering where they understood how to design and build products to manufacture efficiently.

In the 1960’s the financial people wrested control of executive management from the sales and manufacturing executives. These new executives were not producers, they were administrators. They came from top 10 business schools armed with their MBA’s and academic theories as to how to make companies more financially efficient and attractive investments to Wall Street. They slashed sales forces, marketing budgets, product development teams, and capital spending in order to improve reported earnings. They directed the engineering and purchasing staffs to “cost reduce products” by using cheaper components. By starving the factories of capital to purchase new equipment, they ensured the factories would not be able to compete with the new factories in Asia.

There is a knee jerk tendency on Free Republic to blame the loss of US manufacturing on greedy unions. Perhaps that was true in some industries but unions did not control the factories of the South and those factories also fled to Asia. I sat in executive suites in the 1990’s when the outsourcing decisions were made. The financial people, armed with studies from their buddies at Goldman Sachs, wanted the quick Wall Street fix. Announce a big outsourcing effort with a big PR splash telling the market you are going to reduce your cost of production by 20-30%. There will be a quick bounce in the price of the stock. The Wall Street bankers will help finance the move, sell off the assets, and provide capital for the new, highly efficient factory in China. Then, the savings can be plowed into stock buybacks and acquisitions, enabled by the same Wall Street banks. This was the real story of the great outsourcing, not greedy unions.

The US manufacturing people asked for the same new equipment being funded for the Chinese factories and were denied, being told to compete with modern technologically enabled Asian factories using the equipment purchased in the 1950’s and 1960’s before the financial people took over. The US manufacturing managers and engineers were aware of the lean manufacturing techniques and asked for funding to reconfigure the assembly lines and train the workers in the new processes. The financial people running the firms told them it was a waste of money to spend on obsolete factories. The marketing and sales people asked for funding for new product innovation. The financial people told them they couldn’t having funding for products that would take 2-3 years to develop and bring to market. Any investment had to have an immediate payout and impact on the bottom line.

The truth is, the decisions to outsource American manufacturing were made by Harvard MBA’s in the executive suite and on Wall Street. The takeover of corporations by financial people who put in huge bonus incentive structures which provided zero incentive for long term investments in products and production resulted in the stripping of American companies and outsourcing of factories. What CEO would make a three year investment in making a 1950’s factory state of the art when he could see an immediate gain by shutting it down and moving the production to China?


67 posted on 12/02/2012 12:52:39 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: All
Speaking of before "MBA’s and academic theories as to how to make companies more financially efficient" (reply #67) I recall reading in While America Aged that in 1950s when GM had 50 percent of the market the president of GM "Engine Charlie" Wilson's pension was $25,000 / year. About $250,000 in today's dollars, I believe; and that is about ten percent(?) of what big corporation executives get today.
68 posted on 12/02/2012 1:15:35 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Soul of the South
RE: "In the 1960’s the financial people wrested control of executive management from the sales and manufacturing executives. These new executives were not producers, they were administrators. They came from top 10 business schools armed with their MBA’s and academic theories . . . ."

Was one of them that Strange McNamara fellow? who "[a]fter graduating from Harvard Business School, . . . worked a year for the accounting firm Price Waterhouse in San Francisco . . . returned to Harvard to teach accounting in the business school [that included] a program to teach analytical approaches used in business;" and wreaked all that and more upon our military in the JFK administration? That guy was one of them? I remember him. (wiki graffiti source)

74 posted on 12/02/2012 1:45:32 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamofCarmichael; Soul of the South; All
. . . The truth is, the decisions to outsource American manufacturing were made by Harvard MBA’s in the executive suite and on Wall Street. The takeover of corporations by financial people who put in huge bonus incentive structures which provided zero incentive for long term investments in products and production resulted in the stripping of American companies and outsourcing of factories. What CEO would make a three year investment in making a 1950’s factory state of the art when he could see an immediate gain by shutting it down and moving the production to China?

Soul of the South,
This is probably the best summary I've read.

The only comment I would add is this is why Marx promoted 'Free Trade', i.e. free movement of capital across national borders unconstrained by ethics or patriotism.

Coincidentally the first schools infiltrated by Cultural Marxism were the one attended by those MBA's.

As an IT professional, I've seen very similar thinking go into out sourcing and guest workering the field.

William of Carmichael,
Thanks for posting.
76 posted on 12/02/2012 2:05:26 PM PST by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamofCarmichael; Soul of the South

Says it all. Many thanks for posting. This sabotage started years ago is impacting us in the last decade. Now we are left blowing bubbles to hype up an out of wack economy. Real Estate was a good bubble while lasted. Now we have the last bubble for a long time. The Federal Reserve buying up Treasury issued debt and the prediction it will have 5 trillion of it on its books in a few years

Things will get very interesting because the Federale Reserve is a private bank. Not some USG agency that is at least theoretically accountable, even smart people like Mark Steyn believe this. He made that mistake last week.


82 posted on 12/02/2012 3:42:47 PM PST by dennisw (With age comes wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson