Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
Uncle Chip,

You ask some important questions.

According to Crump’s statements back in March, Dee Dee was a minor (wrong, she's 18), she was severely traumatized by Trayvon’s death, and her parents (or, maybe just mother, I forget) wanted to keep her completely out of the public eye.

According to Crump, he contacted Dee Dee's parents by phone, and they agreed to allow her to be phone interviewed, but ONLY by Benjamin Crump.

And, you are not the first person to ask how we know the Dee Dee interviewed by the Florida prosecutor is the same Dee Dee interviewed by Crump - we don't.

Something else of interest...

It appears that Florida law enforcement NEVER tried to obtain the Benjamin Crump tape recording.

The reason?

Who knows - but it's hard to imagine why seasoned prosecutors would be willing to bet their case on Dee Dee before they heard her “first tape.”

20 posted on 12/02/2012 1:14:55 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen
According to Crump, he contacted Dee Dee's parents by phone, and they agreed to allow her to be phone interviewed, but ONLY by Benjamin Crump.

How convenient is that??? only by phone and only by an attorney. Those were Crump's rules not the mother's.

If she is 18 then Crump no longer needed to go through her mother for the rules of the interview. So who's buying that???

The reason Crump won't turn over a clear recording of that interview under any circumstances is that an analysis of the tape would show that the DeeDee of that Crump interview [3/19] was not the DeeDee on the tape of that BDLR deposition on 4/2.

It's the tale of the 2 DeeDees. How could this 18 y/o DeeDee have known Trayvon since kindergarten???

28 posted on 12/02/2012 2:34:08 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen
It appears that Florida law enforcement NEVER tried to obtain the Benjamin Crump tape recording.

The SP Angela Corey took over the case on March 22nd, immediately after the March 20th Crump press conference. It was her duty to secure that tape recording and all the details of that interview, especially since DeeDee was and is the state's star witness in their charging document.

The big question here is what will Corey's office do now that they have this motion, and they know that others know that the cat's out of the bag???

Will they table it and try to talk their way around it at the Dec 11th hearing or will they get the recording device from Crump and get it to the defense on Dec 10th.

And will Judge Nelson continue to play stupid at the Dec 11th hearing???

29 posted on 12/02/2012 2:57:26 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson