Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reformedliberal; Sarah Barracuda
A tax on accumulated wealth is usually called a PROPERTY TAX. There are a number of variations on the theme, but such a tax is a direct tax ~ which is why the federales don't have the constitutional authority to levy them.

States do have that power, and do so ~ since they are not prohibited from engaging in direct taxation.

The income tax is a tax on income, not accumulated wealth, except for those millions of us who live paycheck to paycheck ~ then the income tax is a direct tax on accumulated wealth!

The leftwingtards appear to be unfamiliar with the constitution ~ which mean, ultimately, they will need to be reeducated!

73 posted on 12/01/2012 11:01:01 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

While you are correct, the progs haven’t acted in accordance w/the Constitution up til now. Why would they change? They don’t care. They have the SCOTUS backing them already & w/2 new progressive Justices, any argument of Constitutionality will become moot. IMO.

They would love to get us so riled we demand a Constitutional Convention. Then our Constitution will become a document of positive rights to be parceled out via the Federal Government.

The progressive states can already enact a direct tax and I think they will. When we have 50% of the States doing something, how long before it is *deemed* “Constitutional”?


76 posted on 12/01/2012 1:24:43 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson