You cited some thing from a hundred and fifty years ago that you thought was relevant to the (then) upcoming No Cal storm. But you didn’t think that it was possible? WTF? After twelve years, maybe its time you did take a break — but at a minimum, tone down the condescending attitude and knock off calling other Freepers names just because you disagree with them. Have a good one.
It was a relevant event BECAUSE THE ARTICLE CITED IT. The phenomenon the article is talking about DOES have that potential, but not at this time of year. In the case of conditions similar to 1862, yes, that potential for a massive flood exists. Hence your 'rain in Northern California, so what' comment, was in need of correction with the historical record of what 'rain in Northern California' can do.
But you didnt think that it was possible? WTF?
Not this time of year. Gad are you dense.