Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sibley files motion to hold Obama in Contempt of Court
AMO PROBOS ^ | November 29, 2012 | MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY

Posted on 11/29/2012 11:15:59 PM PST by ABrit

At the November 29, 2012, Preliminary Injunction hearing in Sibley vs. Alexander, Dinan and Lightfoot – a class action lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court against the three District of Columbia Electors of the so-called Electoral College – Barack Hussein Obama, II, refused to produce his original Short-Form “Certificate of Live Birth” and his original Long-Form “Certificate of Live Birth”. These documents are the sole evidence that Mr. Obama has proffered to the American People to establish his Article II, §1, eligibility for the Office of President. I had subpoenaed those documents for the hearing.  As a result, I today filed my Verified Motion for Rule to Show Cause Why Barack Hussein Obama, II, Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court.  Judge Mott has reserved decision on that motion pending a response by the Defendants.

What exactly is the objection to producing your original birth certificates when subpoenaed?  No objection was filed by Mr. Obama or his attorneys.

(Excerpt) Read more at amoprobos.blogspot.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certificate; certifigate; contempt; naturalborncitizen; nbc; nhaturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Seizethecarp

Obama’s lawyers have previously tried to rely on the “public record,” but the burden of proof was shifted in the Kansas ballot challenge by showing that the public record includes a 1991 bio that says Obama was born in Kenya, that Obama’s wife called Kenya her husband’s home country and that his Kenyan step-grandmother said he passed through her hands when he was born, etc. Further, Obama’s lawyers tried to rely on the 14th amendment to make Obama a natural-born citizen, but the argument wasn’t compelling when it was shown that the Supreme Court made a negative declaration that the 14th amendment does NOT say who shall be natural born citizens in Wong Kim Ark (via Minor v. Happersett).


21 posted on 11/30/2012 9:10:48 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

obumpa


22 posted on 12/01/2012 9:21:30 PM PST by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson