And that is why the commies are winning - their side has no qualms about organized civil disobedience, yet our side keeps talking without acting. Picture Paul revere deciding that he should leave his horse stabled so he wouldn't "stoop to sedition"...
In any case, let's say "civil disobedience" is blocking an intersection with a car in order to protest something. What the originator of this thread did was state "let's protest, civil disobedience is a good start, don't be afraid to get bloody, you first." The lack of specificity really lept out at me. Again, maybe I saw it differently than most.