Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
The other side of the story comes out. The fact that the New York Times is reporting Dunn's side of the story is significant.

What is significant about it? Everyone has been reporting the story the same way, as soon as his attorney put out a claim of a shot-gun, everyone reported it, so what is the big deal?

Who has been holding anything back? Heck you have been on a long thread that had all kinds of reporting of it, so why pretend that they weren't?

6 posted on 11/29/2012 1:41:09 AM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

But the NYT wasn’t able to complete the story without one bogus comparison of “no weapon found.” Well in the Traytable case, it is also “no weapon alleged,” and there has not been a formal filing asking for SYG in the Traytable case, which there has to be in order to use it.


9 posted on 11/29/2012 3:35:48 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12; All
What is significant about it? Everyone has been reporting the story the same way, as soon as his attorney put out a claim of a shot-gun, everyone reported it, so what is the big deal?

What is significant about it is that the New York Times is publishing it within two days of the event. George Zimmerman's version of events did not get national coverage for weeks, as I recall.

The significance is how the MSM is handling the situation.

21 posted on 11/29/2012 5:43:37 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson