Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wintertime
I'm sorry, but where did I say anything about a "godless religious worldview"?

The following ( your words) are the very definition of an education that is solidly and irrefutably godless in its worldview. If Sister Mary Victoria ( my 7th grade nun) were still alive she would be more than happy to straighten you out, if you continued to be confused about this point.

Your exact words:

Unless the subject is specifically religion related, I see no reason religion should be discussed in any class. We don't, for example, discuss integral calculus in English class, or the declension of Latin nouns in intermediate band class. And the only reason you would see something religious about the topics of biology/geology/astrophysics etc., is because you are injecting a religious component to those subjects where none exists.

In other words, you could not find a single example in all of the 6 or 7 thousand posts I've made on FR where I actually expressed a godless world view. You are making the same false assumption promoted by many of the creationist quacks, that someone who studies science and fails to relate every single word they say on any subject to Jesus is a flaming atheist.

In my and my husband's Catholic schooling there was more than enough reason an opportunity to discuss religion in all of the classes that you mentioned above. In our family's homeschool as well. Gee! How did our family ever get to be so successful? Amazing isn't it?

Finding a reason to inject religion into every discussion is not the same as religion being an integral part of the subject. Did you also inject discussions of the equally relevant religions of Buddhism, Taoism, Zoroastrianism, Islamism, Hinduism, etc., into your homeschool calculus or Latin classes?

And since you mention that you are Catholic, I'll point out that the Catholic church (as do most organized denominations) accepts the scientific theory of evolution.

Wikipedia: Catholic Church and evolution

New York Times: Many Catholics Welcome Pope's Statement on Evolution

I have found that most literal creationism is promoted by a bunch of charlatans who care more about separating people from their money than they do about people's souls.

In any case, I am not sure why someone wanted to turn this into a science vs. creationism thread, since the article at the top is about withholding care from babies in order to save money in a socialist health care system. They are completely unrelated topics.

82 posted on 12/09/2012 12:22:37 PM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom
If it weren't for compulsory, socialist-funded, and single-payer K-12 government schooling, macro-evolution would be only be of interest to a handful scientists actually working in this field of study.

Solution: Complete privatization of K-12 schooling.

You get to send kids to schools that support and uphold your worldview.

I get to send kids to schools of my choice ( which by the way would support evolution theory).

And,..Our neighbors would get schools best suited to their worldview.

So?.....Who could complain about that? Well...It is an anecdotal observation of mine that the biggest bullies and supporters of compulsory government owned and run schools are evolutionists.

83 posted on 12/09/2012 1:36:29 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson