Posted on 11/28/2012 11:44:19 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
In response to a question from reporter Major Garrett on whether the Obama administration's mishandling of Benghazi raises "core questions of basic competency," press secretary Jay Carney revealed that Barack Obama "is not particularly concerned" about whether Susan Rice misled the American people:
"What the president is worried about, Major, is what happened and why in Benghazi. He is not particularly concerned about whether the ambassador or I went out and talked about the fact that we believed extremists might have been responsible.
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
Yes, indeed. Krauthammer rightly called that "the fourth scandal."
I already knew that.
Two plausible explanations have been suggested for this curious scandal.
1. The Ambassador, who had a record of working closely with the terrorists during Obama’s war against Kaddafi, had agreed to be “kidnapped,” so Obama could arrange a trade for him and the Blind Sheikh, thus pleasing his Muslim allies while having a great October surprise in the run-up to the election.
2. The Ambassador was in the area to pass weapons along to the terrorists for use in Syria and elsewhere, under the pretence of trying to STOP the flow of weapons into terrorist hands.
It seems perfectly plausible that BOTH of these explanations could be true. First Obama tried to keep all the defenders away so the ambassador could be quietly kidnapped. But that plan was disappointed. The terrorists assumed that they had been ambushed and betrayed, so they raped and murdered the ambassador.
Subsequently, after the violence had broken out, Obama decided to continue refusing any help, in order to let the ambassador be killed and prevent anyone from getting too near the site until any possible evidence of what happened had been destroyed.
” Subsequently, after the violence had broken out, Obama decided to continue refusing any help, in order to let the ambassador be killed and prevent anyone from getting too near the site until any possible evidence of what happened had been destroyed.”
I like this one.
When the highly paid liberal talking heads begin to get their tax bills the tide may start to turn.
Please put me on your Benghazi ping list—we have to keep up the heat.
As he TOLD her what to say—he values loyalty over truthfulness.
they dont care if we know they are crooking us..it doesnt matter to them ....we are all flies to be swatted and smashed.
Obama “is not particularly concerned”
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
This should surprise no one. And I think the White House's lack of concern about the dishonesty of public officials is, in a way, transparent.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
This should surprise no one. And I think the White House's lack of concern about the dishonesty of public officials is, in a way, transparent.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
This should surprise no one. And I think the White House's lack of concern about the dishonesty of public officials is, in a way, transparent.
“But, he has better become concerned when the cover up is exposed beyond a shadow of a doubt, and the public learns and understands what this election is all about.”
Don’t even hold your breath on this one.
“Who knows how far he will take the country by 2016 and who will be allowed to report it.”
The movie “2016, obama’s America” makes it quite clear.
As Dennis Prager says, being a liberal means “never having to say you’re sorry.”
we are screwed with the Kenyan in the White House but this election has shown that Americans like him and will vote for this lying POS.
Just saying but Obama is a reflection of the degeneracy of the American public
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.