Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
But even if taxes on the rich did go directly to deficit reduction, it wouldn’t be enough. Earlier this month, the Congressional Budget Office put the 2012 deficit at $1.1 trillion. It noted that this was the fourth straight year of trillion-plus deficits. This year, the deficit is 7 percent of the gross domestic product.

CBO projections don’t show much change in the annual deficit over the next decade. So even if the additional income taxes amounted to the $829 billion figure, the extra revenue would not eliminate the annual deficit, and it would do nothing to pay down the accumulated national debt of $16 trillion.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2963733/posts

13 posted on 11/28/2012 10:37:43 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: TurboZamboni

That was the backdrop of my “nitwit” judgment. No matter how much they take, and from whom they take it, there will never be enough to pay for the “benefits” our government is currently promising. As Mark Steyn says, there’s not enough money in the whole world to pay the U.S.’s bills.

In my opinion, there is no reasonable outcome other than a complete crash. The author’s closing line about matching higher taxes with spending reform is just the same old dream sequence. It will never happen. If the political will to reform spending existed, the reform would happen without any increases in tax rates ... and then revenues would increase, anyway, as the economy crawled out from under a rock and began laying eggs (so to speak).


17 posted on 11/28/2012 10:46:25 AM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson