Fine, go ahead and act like one of the profane Libtards. We’ll throw your profane ass into a Federal prison along with anyone else committing subversion and treason against the People of the United States and the Constitution for attempting unconstitutional secession and subversion of the Republican form of government mandated by the Constitution.
Hi Wlat - have you been all tied up or just hanging around?
“Fine, go ahead and act like one of the profane Libtards. We’ll throw your profane ass into a Federal prison along with anyone else committing subversion and treason against the People of the United States and the Constitution for attempting unconstitutional secession and subversion of the Republican form of government mandated by the Constitution.”
Spoken like every other murdering statist who ever lived.
Liquidate the Optimates/kulaks/Trostkyites/subhumans/ whatever.
Dissent is not allowed in Utopia.
Just wow!
What an incredible statement. You are an absolute fool!
Are you implicitly assuming that our current federal government is operating in accordance with the Constitution of the United States? Would it then be legal by your standards for a majority of states to expel the "blue states" from the Union? I'm okay with that option too, although I think your application of the "treason" rhetoric is entirely inappropriate to the situation, whether the issue is (1) secession of the states that want to be governed under a written Constitution with enumerated powers or (2) expulsion of the states that wanted to be ruled by an unlimited government presence operating under a "living constitution" that means whatever they want it to mean.
It is not treasonous to advocate for constitutional government in which the words of the constitution mean what they say. Personally, I consider it treasonous to advocate for continuing the massive overreach of federal intrusion into our lives, which directly violates the Constitution, although I prefer to avoid the "treason" discussion because the connotations distract from the legitimate arguments in favor of one position and interfere with identifying any legitimate arguments that the other side might have other than that hot-button word, "treason".
You've tried to stifle discussion of this article by calling Walter Williams a liar; then by trying to sidetrack the discussion into one about the Civil War; then with the meaningless insertion of the Articles of Confederation.
None of that stopped the discussion, or killed the thread.
Now you're resorting to personal threats against the commenters.
Now that there is some Alinskyite, communist tactics.