[stephenjohnbanker]

” There are far too many examples of precincts that delivered fraudulent votes in key cities to pack the totals that may have impacted who got the electoral votes in many swing states. This tactic was so pervasive it earned its own name of “spigot cities.” In 59 Philadelphia, PA precincts, Obama recorded 100% of the votes. In Cleveland, OH districts, Obama recorded 100% of the votes. In 100 precincts in Ohio, Obama recorded 99% of the votes. In Broward County, FL precincts, Obama received over 99% of the votes. In one precinct, a rout over 99% is a possibility but hundreds of precincts recording over 99% exceed any possibility of credibility. In St. Lucie County, FL, 141% of eligible voters turned out to vote! (Statistically impossible) In Ohio, Obama won a county by 108% of registered voters. In two counties in Colorado, voting turnout exceeded the voter-age population”

There you are.

[Nachum]

Well done. I will post that on the website-

[CharlesWayneCT]

Here you are:

1. Receiving 100% of the vote in certain precincts is not unusual. Why do people think an all-black inner-city public housing unit is going to have republican voters?
2. "In St Lucie County, FL, 141% of eligible voters" - false; people misread the election report, there were 2 ballots per voter. Voter turnout was 71%, ballots cast were 141% of registered voters.
3. "In Ohio, Obama won a county by 108% of registered voters" - false. In that county, voter registration was 108% of the census eligible voter number. That's because they don't purge registrations; the county was a college town, so thousands of students were still on the rolls. Actual turnout was 57%, lower than average, reflecting the inflation of registration numbers. Obama got 51% of the 57%, or about 27%. A little less than "108%".
4. "In two counties in Colorado, voting turnout exceeded the voter-age population” - false. Once again, lazy or ignorant people took a pre-election report that total registrations exceeded voting-age population (again, due to bad purging of voter rolls), and turned it into a claim that actual VOTES exceeded the number, which they did not. A check of the official returns will show normal voting patterns in all counties in Colorado.

I did a check on the Ohio "100%" precincts, and found that the numbers weren't significantly different from 2008. I guess someone could argue there was massive fraud in 2008 as well, but you can't argue that these numbers are unprecedented when they just happened 4 years ago.

I checked a precinct called out in Richmond, and found that no republican ever gets more than a few votes in that precinct, even when winning hugely (like the governor in 2009).