Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mikefive
And ONE more Ranger/SF weighs in.

Women just don't have it, not matter how butch they are.

Still, I agree with the ACLU and say put them on point like every other private. Let them get full of wholes and lose their limbs on the same basis as our male military. Let them die at the same level.

They want equality...well, there it is. I've lost all interest in protecting women. They want to die and lose their eyesight, half their brains, and limbs for their country, so be it. I will respect them for doing such, but never understand why this Nation allowed such.

74 posted on 11/27/2012 7:29:05 PM PST by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: A Navy Vet; USAF80

First, we don’t put women in combat because a nation must win its wars. There is no 2nd place in warfare. You either win or you are conquered.

Second, real men don’t view women as cannon fodder no matter how stupid the women are behaving.

Third, men + women = sex. And sexual relationships are a force detractor not a force multiplier. The detriments range from rivalries to pregnancies to favoritism. Rivalries and favoritism cause dissension in your force. Pregnancies (generally on purpose) deplete your force as the pregnant ones are removed without replacements showing up for long periods of time, resulting in under-manned units.

Fourth, physical ability. You can carry a wounded her off the battlefield, but she can’t carry you. Again, demoralization of troops will result.


80 posted on 11/28/2012 4:53:27 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson