[GingisK]

I’ve never experienced war...but I also feel that if the left wants to push this, then send them to the front lines.

Females in combat would cause numerous difficulties. They would require certain "personnel items" that would take up room in cargo vehicles normally used for ammo, food, and water. They could, if they were not ugly dykes, potentially cause attention deficits which would give rise to security risks. Finally, they are not strong enough to help the big guys over obstacles or pull wounded teammates to safety.

[Persevero]

‘Females in combat would cause numerous difficulties. They would require certain “personnel items” that would take up room in cargo vehicles normally used for ammo, food, and water. They could, if they were not ugly dykes, potentially cause attention deficits which would give rise to security risks. Finally, they are not strong enough to help the big guys over obstacles or pull wounded teammates to safety. “

They also get raped, and they also get pregnant.

[Hulka]

“They would require certain “personnel items” that would take up room in cargo vehicles normally used for ammo, food, and water. “

THAT is so true. Gulf War I, Day 2 in Iraq. In the TOC, staff meeting in progress and the S-4 and S-3 engaged in a discussion regarding how best to ensure “female” items are ordered and able to be delivered to HHC (only place where we had females).

Here we were, in combat, days into the ground war, talking about re-supply and we were talking about making room for female products??!!