Sounds like that should be up there with Philly and Cleveland as examples of the subversion of our electoral process.
1 posted on
11/24/2012 11:07:23 AM PST by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Communists controlled this election.
To: Olog-hai
If Russia updates their Nuclear first strike list, I will help them prioritize it for free.
Just a little joke BOR.
3 posted on
11/24/2012 11:11:09 AM PST by
Kickass Conservative
(As the Chinese say, erections have consequences...)
To: Olog-hai
I’d be embarrassed to live in such a brain-dead part of the country, where everyone thinks and votes alike. It smacks of the old Soviet Union.
4 posted on
11/24/2012 11:11:28 AM PST by
txrefugee
To: Olog-hai
What happened in these same districts in 2008 ???
What did McCain/Palin get 4 years ago, compare side by side with 2012, district by district.
To: newgeezer
This is what Dems refer to as “Ground Game”. Most of us just call it fraud.
6 posted on
11/24/2012 11:15:19 AM PST by
DungeonMaster
(Not voting against multiple ObamaPhoneWoman votes anymore.)
To: patriot8
7 posted on
11/24/2012 11:15:29 AM PST by
onyx
(FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
To: All
8 posted on
11/24/2012 11:16:03 AM PST by
onyx
(FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
To: Olog-hai
It appears as though the ballot box thing doesn’t work in this country anymore. 2012 was all the proof anyone needs of that.
9 posted on
11/24/2012 11:17:35 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Criminal defense lawyers won't have the Twinkie to kick around anymore.)
To: Olog-hai
Sounds like that should be up there with Philly and Cleveland as examples of the subversion of our electoral process. Even if there were not some sort of fraud to prevent a single Romney vote out of 400 and these ghetto blacks were allowed to vote freely, how many of them would vote for Romney? 4% or 16 out of 400 like the rest of the blacks? Probably less. A handful of votes out of 400 is probably the right number for that population. Getting zero in a few percent of the precincts may be luck or some voter coaching or an gang agreement or something like that.
Does it really matter that Romney got zero instead of the 4 that he should have gotten? Practically speaking, it does not.
10 posted on
11/24/2012 11:17:50 AM PST by
palmer
(Jim, please bill me 50 cents for this completely useless post)
To: Olog-hai
91 precincts at 100% = Why even bother pretending anymore? America has died, not with a bang but a whimper.
14 posted on
11/24/2012 11:52:38 AM PST by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: Olog-hai
...91 of the citys 5,286 precincts, Mr. Obama received 100 percent of the vote. Would those be the precincts above 116th street?
-PJ
20 posted on
11/24/2012 1:06:33 PM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: Olog-hai
Saul Alinsky-type tactics were used in this election — Go the opposite way than what is anticipated: Certainly, as anticipated, there was significant vote fraud that gave Obama votes. But, the un-anticipated — vote fraud that probably even more significantly, TOOK ROMNEY VOTES AWAY. It wouldn’t have mattered in New York, but other areas, it may well have mattered.
To: Olog-hai
wonder how many cemetery's are located in those area's??
26 posted on
11/24/2012 5:21:57 PM PST by
bikerman
(What ever happens from now is all OBAMA's fault. Obama lied,economy died)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson