I did not make the comments as proof that Romney was an improvement.
I'm making the point that turnout was not DOWN as had been reported. It's not about the candidate. It's about voters.
Don't twist stuff.
I'm refuting your ridiculous point, it was obviously the candidate, that is why in two reverse image elections, Romney only equaled 2008, instead of surpassing it by millions.
By the way, it wasn't "about voters", it was about Mitt Romney, you can't blame the potential customers, the market place, for your lack of a product.